Back to Insight
NDPEMay 28, 20266 min read

Why NDPE still matters beyond EUDR

EUDR sets the deadline. NDPE sets the substance. A look at why a compliant supplier on paper is not the same as a responsible one in the field.

MW

Maya Wirahadi

Policy Lead, Geometrack

Policy brief · Brussels / Jakarta
Where regulation ends and commitment begins.

EUDR is the most operational deforestation regulation any commodity buyer has ever had to comply with. It also covers the narrowest definition of responsibility we've seen put into law: no deforestation after December 2020, traceable to plot, legally produced. That's it. Buyers who treat EUDR as the ceiling are about to discover how thin that ceiling is.

NDPE — No Deforestation, No Peat, No Exploitation — predates EUDR by a decade and was built by the industry itself, partly under NGO pressure and partly because the largest buyers needed a shared language for what 'responsible' actually meant. It covers things EUDR does not: peat regardless of forest cover, labor and indigenous rights, grievance handling, and supplier development.

Three places EUDR stops and NDPE keeps going

  • Peat outside forest definitions — EUDR's forest definition leaves significant peat conversion outside scope. NDPE explicitly covers peat regardless of canopy.
  • Social and labor risk — EUDR references local law on rights; NDPE commits to FPIC, grievance mechanisms, and remediation as a standing practice.
  • Supplier development — EUDR is pass/fail at the shipment level. NDPE assumes a relationship: suspended suppliers can be brought back through recovery work, not just dropped.

Dec 2020

EUDR cut-off date

2013

First major NDPE commitment published

~85%

Of global palm volume nominally covered by NDPE

<40%

Of that volume independently verified

The compliance trap

We've already seen buyers re-scope NDPE programmes downward to 'EUDR-aligned'. On paper this looks like consolidation. In practice it means dropping the parts of NDPE — peat, labor, grievance — that aren't enforceable in Brussels but are very much enforceable in a stakeholder review, a media investigation, or a class-action filing.

"EUDR will not protect your brand from an NDPE failure. It was never designed to."

What we recommend through 2026

  • Keep NDPE as the operating standard; treat EUDR as a reporting overlay, not a replacement.
  • Maintain UBO-level grievance tracking — EUDR doesn't require it, but every serious civil-society actor does.
  • Budget for recovery work. Suspending a non-compliant mill is the easy decision; bringing it back compliantly is the one that scales.

Compliance and commitment are not the same thing. EUDR raised the floor. NDPE — if you keep it honest — is still what holds the ceiling up.

Newsletter

Get the work in your inbox.

Field notes, methodology, and quiet updates. No noise.

We respect your inbox. Unsubscribe anytime.